One trusts that an American electorate mesmerized by Reality TV and the
NFL/NBA regular season schedules will stop long enough to contemplate the
apocalyptic implications of Gordon Thomas's October 27th exclusive for the
American Free Press: that George Bush's neo-conservative regime has
secretly flown 100 Harpoon cruise missiles tipped with nuclear warheads to
the joint American-UK military base stationed on the remote Indian Ocean
island of Diego Garcia. Thomas informs us that it is now known where 72 of
these Harpoons have been subsequently assigned--to three Israeli
Dolphin-class submarines (24 apiece) that have subsequently left Diego for
the Gulf of Oman. The purpose? To target Iranian nuclear facilities well
within the range of the Dolphins and their collective nuclear-tipped payload
supplied by the United States. Most ominously, these instruments of mass
death and destruction are under the command-and-launch decision making
authority of one Ariel Sharon, whose moral, political, and military mindset
is best revealed by his pivotal role in the Sabra and Shatila massacres in
southern Lebanon in 1982, along with occupational policies on the West Bank
and Gaza that have recently included the deliberate IDF bulldozing to death
of Olympia, Washington's Rachel Corrie, an unarmed peace activist protesting
Palestinian house demolitions sanctioned by the Sharon government.
It gets worse. The Thomas story has subsequently been confirmed by a
senior aide to Bush National Security Advisor Condolezza Rice for both the
Los Angeles Times and London's Guardian newspaper.
Where, pray tell, is the American media and Congress in confronting
George Bush with the absolutely incomprehensible decision to supply any
government--much less the Sharon regime in Tel Aviv--with American nuclear
weaponry and the accompanying authority to decide if, when, and against whom
the Apocalpyse is to be unleashed? Who are the powers in his Administration
who have set this obviously reckless and derailing course of action in
motion? May we conclude that they are largely the same advisors--with
direct connections to the Likud regime in Israel--who urged the President to
involve American men and women in an ill-conceived preemptive strike against
Iraq, where the fraudulent Administration claims about Weapons of Mass
Destruction in that country are made all the more maddening by the obvious,
enveloping quicksand of death, debt, and international ill-will increasing
exponentially by the day? And where are the medallioned luminaries of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff in this nightmare--scheduling this week's tee times at
the Congressional Country Club?
Pat Buchanan correctly observes that Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz,
Perle, Feith, Wurmser and Company have now placed themselves, and their
countrymen, in mortal peril with the neo-conservative strategy on preemptive
military action against Iraq and the subsequent occupation. As Mr. Buchanan
analyzes things, the Project for the New American Century crowd has only
three options in the political and military morass created since March. The
first is to withdraw from Iraq completely, an option made problematic by the
subsequent power vacuum, civil war, and outside interventionism that would
surely follow. A second involves continuing the present course of action by
priming the pump of American lives and dollars in the elusive hope that a
responsible government and economic infrastructure for the Iraqi people can
emerge from the present chaos and violence. Buchanan notes here that the
elusiveness of the goal is matched by the thinning of the patience and
political will of the American electorate for Mr. Bush's version of the War
on Terrorism and For World Democracy. The third is the most ominous of
all--a deliberate escalation of American military interventionism in the
Middle East by preemptive attacks against Syria and Iran, with all of the
attendant risks.
The Thomas report on Harpoons for the American Free Press must be seen
as the most significant sign yet that it is the third option which has been
selected in the secret and dark inner counsels of the Bush national security
team. The Boys of Empire and Sharon lead us to Apocalypse Future.
(Mark Dankof is a correspondent for Uncensored News and Views. A 3rd party
candidate for the U. S. Senate in Delaware in 2000, he is an ordained
Lutheran pastor and post-graduate student in systematic theology at
Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia. His web site is entitled
Mark Dankof's America at www.MarkDankof.com)
Want to help spread quality independent journalism? Donate to NileMedia and watch us grow.
Details...
|