(Originally published in the San Antonio Express-News)
If we believe the U.S. media's portrayal of the Middle East conflict, then we
already have identified the good guys and the terrorists. From local
newspapers to Hollywood films, we recognize Israeli Jews as civilized,
reasonable and democratic and Palestinians as terrorists.
Now this simplistic scenario is beginning to unravel as we see images of
stone-throwing Palestinian youths facing Israeli tanks and supersonic F-16
jets bombing neighborhood factories. So to ensure continued unconditional
U.S. support, Israeli Prime Minster Ariel Sharon recently called for a total
cease-fire.
But after rejecting a key recommendation of the Mitchell commission 'a
freeze on Israeli settlements' Sharon's offer is a deceitful ploy. The
Palestinians
would be foolish to accept more settlement expansion, which further reduces
what little territory they have left. Moreover, these settlements are in
violation of
U.N. resolutions and international law.
There are two kinds of terrorism in this ancient, contested land: The terror
of occupation and the terror of desperation.
Suicide bombers are desperate, but they are not simpletons propagandized into
martyrdom. Their family members, friends and neighbors have been killed,
tortured, maimed or made homeless by Israeli authorities. The media will call
them cowards, but what would any red-blooded American do if invaders were to
occupy and terrorize our country?
The terror of desperation is born out of brutality, deprivation and
powerlessness; it is sporadic, indiscriminate and often counterproductive.
The media
would have us believe Israel is only responding to terrorism, but this belies
the historical realities of the terror of occupation.
It wasn't the Palestinians but Zionist extremists who introduced terrorism
into the Holy Land. In the 1920s, they placed bombs in Arab marketplaces to
terrorize
civilians. It was Zionist terrorism that, after two decades, drove the
British out of Palestine to establish a Jewish state. With the establishment
of Israel, Palestinians became aliens in their own land. Ruled by military
edict, they were denied freedom of movement, equal education and
rights to own land. In fact, 78 percent of what historically had been Arab
Palestine became Israeli. Today, Palestinians are fighting just to recover the
West Bank and Gaza, 22 percent of historic Palestine. Yet Israel controls
about half these territories.
The terror of Israeli occupation is akin to slow strangulation; houses are
demolished, orchards destroyed, roads blockaded and water and power
manipulated.
Most of all, the terror of occupation is unforgivingly violent. A
disproportionate amount of military aggression will be used against
protesters,
stone-throwers bystanders and even security police.
Local physicians long ago determined that most of the stone-throwing youth
and children who were killed had been shot in the head or upper body. This
shoot-to-kill extends to Palestinian leaders, with Israeli missiles acting as
judge, jury and prosecutor.
As many predicted, the violence has escalated dramatically since the election
of Sharon. His election was hailed by major pro-Israel Jewish organizations.
The American Jewish Congress noted, "He is widely recognized as one of
Israel's greatest military heroes."
Sharon does have a quite a record. In 1953, he led a commando squad that
massacred 69 men, women and children in Qibbiya. After the 1967 war, he
ordered
the assassination of more than 100 Palestinian resistance leaders. In 1982,
his forces allowed, if not encouraged, Israeli-supported Lebanese militia to
murder more than 900 Palestinian refugees at Sabra and Shatila.
Yet Sharon already has met twice with President Bush, while Yasser Arafat
awaits his first invitation.
Still, we are told Uncle Sam is the only unbiased broker for Middle East
peace. That's certainly demonstrated by U.S. aid to Israel, which 'including
military support from 1949 through 2001' exceeds $90 billion. Moreover, our
Mideast policy has long been dictated by Israel's powerful lobby, as
documented by former Congressman Paul Findley in his book, "They Dare To
Speak Out."
Neither Israel nor Uncle Sam would permit an international peace-keeping
force or international observers, because they wouldn't "be fair" to Israel.
Perhaps they know that for decades Israel has violated numerous U.N.
resolutions by denying basic human rights to Palestinians.
And then we wonder why our allies voted us off the U.N. Human Rights
Commission.
I urge Americans to take off their media blinders, check out other sources of
information, such as the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (www.washington-report.org), and open their hearts and minds to the full story.
Julio Noboa is an educator and free-lance writer. To
message him, e-mail JNPAPR@aol.com
|