I
Travel opens up the vistas of your mind. It is wonderful to roam our
beautiful Earth, from France to Norway, from China to Russia, from Africa to
Latin America, enjoying its variety and hospitality, and the profession of
reporter gives you a chance to see the world. But eventually one pays
attention to an interesting coincidence. It could happen to you in
Marseille, as you walk by the inner harbour, or in Brittany, in the
fishermen's city of Oriente, in Guatemala or Nicaragua, in Milan, this
capital of Italian fashion, in Naples or in Shanghai, in Russian White Sea
port of Archangel or in the middle of China, in Berlin and Hamburg, in the
passes of Hindukush, in Tokyo and Baghdad, Manila or Havana. Suddenly you
notice that all these exotic and diverse places have one thing in common, -
they were bombed by Brits and Yankees. These guys sure get around. Today we
bomb Afghanistan, tomorrow the rest, or whatever they sing in the Air
Force.
The reasons vary. They had bombed China for the stubborn Chinese did not
want to buy their opium, Columbia, for they were selling drugs, Russians and
Vietnamese, for being Commies, Cambodians, for being there, Germans and
French, for offending Jews, Iraqis, for hard cash and Sudanese by mistake.
Now, we've got a sneak preview of their next campaign, courtesy of the
Washington Post [1]. The men in charge of the US, and I mean real mensch,
not this nincompoop in the White House, conspire to erase Iraq, to continue
with Saudi Arabia and finish off with Egypt. The news was broken gently by a
strategist with a wholesome all-American name Murawiec, smuggled into
Pentagon by one of the mensch in charge, Defence Policy Board Chairman
Richard N. Perle. This Jewish hawk, a friend of Sharon, a devoted Zionist,
should be considered the real author of the blueprint calling for seizure of
the Arabian oil fields, transfer of Mecca and Medina unto Jordanian rule and
confiscation of Saudi assets.
The Saudis have feigned amazement, while the US columnists [2] tried to play
down the story and have a good laugh. It surely has its comic value. Glib
assessments, 'Wars have been the principal output of the Arab world' sound
particularly rich when coming from a proponent of Judeo-American cult,
probably the most violent and war-prone since Genghis Khan. Muraviec's
rhetoric question, What has the Arab world produced?' reminded me of a
thieving banker, Flatto-Sharon, who had escaped French police to Israel,
bribed voters, got elected into the Parliament and there he had the temerity
to ask Yitzhak Rabin in his beginners' Hebrew, 'what did you do for the
state of Israel?' ('ma ata asita bishvil hamedina'). It remained as one of
the best Israeli jokes.
But I was neither amazed nor amused. The desire to plunder and kill Arabs is
frequently vented in the Jewish circles, but recently it run into snags. The
Palestinian property had been looted years ago, their lands and houses taken
over and resold. While killing Palestinians may be pleasing to the god of
vengeance, it is not a very profitable exercise. Squeeze of the remainder
goes too slow for the impatient and accustomed to NASDAQ growth folks.
Iraq seems to be an appealing target for mass murder, and in the prestigious
Jewish World Review [3], a Jewish American columnist Jonah Goldberg calls:
'Baghdad must be destroyed' America should go to war with Iraq even if that
risks innocent Iraqi 'and American' lives'. Although life or death of a
Goy is surely no objection, there is no money in bombing Iraq, either.
The riches of the Arabian Peninsula hoodwink the Jews, being tantalisingly
within the reach of IDF Merkaba tanks. This temptation was well expressed by
Jewish American Professor David D. Perlmutter in LA Times[4]: 'I daydream -
if only! If in 1948, 1956, 1967 or 1973 Israel had acted just a bit like the
Third Reich, then today Jews, not sheiks, would have that Gulf oil'. One
would think that Saudi crude goes to the US, why should an American
professor mind it? But your average American Jew values his Jewish-ness well
above his American-ness. Witty Joe Sobran noted, 'It was once considered
"anti-Semitic" to impute "dual loyalty" to [American] Jews. This is now
passé. Dual loyalty nothing! Dual loyalty would be an improvement!' in
comparison with their single-minded devotion to their own national
interests.
In order to turn the Perlmutter's daydream into reality, usually quite
diverse Jewish voices of extreme right and shades of Left united. While
Richard Perle is as right-wing as they make it, Justin Raimondo noticed
'ex-leftist David Horowitz, who demands all-out war on the Arab world, and
Stephen Schwartz, ex-Trotskyite, who became a major theoretician of the
Riyadh-as-"kernel of evil" school. Even anti-Zionist Trotskyite Lenni
Brenner, whose brilliant pen and cheerful style I admire, decided to join
the US warriors, and called to launch feminist crusade against Saudi Arabia.
The Jewish-owned media amplified these opinions. A Jewish journalist, Miss
Slavin, reported in USA TODAY [5], published by the top Jewish leader, Mort
Zuckerman, that a Jewish analyst Max Singer, (a founder of the conservative
Hudson Institute, who never had been to Saudi Arabia but frequents Israel),
suggested to Pentagon officials to dismantle the Kingdom. Value of Mr Singer
's opinion is next to nil, but it has received good media coverage more
important opinions have been denied. There was no article by an
Arab-American calling to dismantle Israel, just for the balance. It appears
the organised Jews firmly planted Saudis in the cross-hairs of their
formidable weapon, the mass media.
It leaves us with a difficult query, why do some American forces, and the
American Jews among them, want to destroy Saudi Arabia, the faithful ally of
the US and a very moderate power in regional context? And another one, what
could be done about it?
II
WHY AND HOW
Optimists argue that it is just a threat, a psychological warfare, a
pressure applied to the kingdom. The reasons for such pressure could be
explained by need of American oil companies to threaten Saudis into
obedience and extend their contracts. Alternatively, the US military needs
to use Saudi air bases for attack on Iraq, and the Arabs are not
sufficiently obsequious.
But I am not sure it is an empty threat. We live in the shadow of ongoing
meltdown of the dollar and the American-based financial pyramid [6]. It
began in August 2001, caused 9/11 as the means to slow the meltdown, and
goes on, gathering speed as an avalanche snowball. Saudis have too much
dollar reserves. Elimination ('freezing') of their dollar assets would slow
the meltdown, as vast trillions of dollars will vanish from the marketplace.
While injection of money causes inflation, its evaporation will cause
deflationary, upward pressure on the dollar. In other words, for the Wall
Street, it makes sense to frieze Saudi assets, as they froze the assets of
Iran and Iraq.
Saudi rulers probably have time to counteract it, if they use the advice of
Woody Allen, 'take the money and run'. They should shift their holdings out
of the collapsing dollar zone, into Euro, Yen or gold. The great idea of
golden 'Islamic dinar' promoted by the wise Prime Minister of Malaysia, Dr
Mahathir should be activated immediately. The Saudis could learn much from
Dr Mahathir who succeeded to turn his strife-torn poor country living off
oil and natural rubber into the prosperous land of national accord and
stable economy. The Malaysians squared the circle: their immigrant
communities are fully integrated, have equal rights, and still do not
endanger the indigenous Malay group. They develop high tech industries,
support charities, provide welfare state; there is no discrimination, no
poor or needy people in Malaysia. They do not depend on the US, do not
provide their land for the US bases, do not invest in the US, and still
remain on friendly terms with Washington. Following the Malaysian way, the
Kingdom will reduce its vulnerability.
Alas, it would not diminish the Jewish appetite for Arab oil, nor the
organised Jewish hostility to ar- Riyadh. Saudi rulers are uncomfortably
conscious of the threat, but they misinterpreted its context. They accepted
as a real coin, the faked three-dollar bill of 'peace-seeking Israel'. That
is why Prince Abdullah tried to entice Israel with his peace plan. That is
why the Kingdom's support of the Palestinian cause is rather symbolic. Saudi
rulers have been told by their American advisers that Israel would not push
for Saudi destruction if Saudis will behave, that is stay away from the
Palestinian problem.
Now, the Saudis have to pay heed to unpleasant reality. Israel is not just a
small Middle Eastern country anymore, but a forward element of the new
aggressive international force, Jewish supremacists. They have too many good
reasons to undo Saudi Arabia.
- This prosperous and well-armed country must be brought down to its knees
before Israel will make its most important step, seizure and destruction of
the beautiful Umayyad Mosques in Jerusalem.
- Saudis have too much money, too much oil and too few friends. This
combination brought Kuwait down, but the US bombed Iraq to restore the Emir
of Kuwait. Washington is not going to repeat this feat when the Saudi oil
fields will pass into Israeli hands.
- The Viagra of Saudi money would invigorate flabby Dow Jones.
There is an additional reason. The Jewish conscience had been poisoned by
sweet dreams of revenge for the defeats of times long gone. Mainstream
Jewish scholars of 19th and 20th century betrayed their audience, and,
instead of describing real Jewish history, created an idealised and
distorted picture of wonderful past, old grievances, undeserved wrong-doing
and revenge dreams. Their readers swallowed the fabricated stories and grew
up as unrestrained nationalists. Modern Jews are victims of nationalist
propaganda, misled and disoriented, induced with desire to rectify the
mythic wrong.
The Jewish state was established to undo the perceived results of the Roman
victory of AD 70, and now a new idea floats in the air, to undo the
perceived results of Prophet Muhammad's victory over the Jewish tribes [7]
and to bring the peninsula under Jewish rule. Together with the desire to
undo the victory of Christianity, this archaic spirit will inevitably cause
more turmoil in the world.
This spirit reminded me of Sweeney Todd, the Demon Barber in a late 1970s
horror musical comedy. Sweeney Todd 'has served the dark and vengeful god,
and trod the path a few did trod', namely turned his customers into savoury
pies' stuffing in order to exact revenge on the Judge who wronged him.
The Saudis should act before it is too late. They should
- re-think their relationship with the Palestinians, and treat them as
their outward defence rather than as poor relatives. Without Palestinians,
Saudi Arabia would be taken over tomorrow.
- there should be more effort and money spent on public discourse in the US
and Europe, as Edward Said constantly reminded the Arabs.
- We should confront the archaic tendency among Jews and promote a
different spirit, a spirit of understanding and brotherhood. Though it is
not taught in Jewish schools, Prophet Muhammad won his battles not only by
sword, but by attracting like-minded Jews to the banner of Islam, as well.
Early converts, the Jews for Allah and His Messenger, fought under the green
banner of Islam on every battlefield from Yarmuk to Cairo.
There are many good Jews, in Israel and in the US alike, and there is no
reason for confrontation between the descendents of Abraham, but the
restless spirit of Sweeney Todd should be exorcised.
NOTES:
[1] Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies, Ultimatum Urged To Pentagon Board,
By Thomas E. Ricks Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, August 6, 2002;
Page A01
[2] The PowerPoint That Rocked the Pentagon, The LaRouchie defector who's
advising the defense establishment on Saudi Arabia. By Jack Shafer
and
GOING AFTER THE SAUDIS Big Oil joins up with the neocons √ and a LaRouche
'defector'
By Justin Raimondo August 9, 2002
www.antiwar.com/justin/justincol.html
[3] Debating War Against Iraq By Jonah Goldberg -- Jewish World Review --
July 17, 2002
www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/jonah.html
[4] April 7, 2002
[5] Anti-Saudi arguments get heard Friday, Aug 9, 2002 Barbara Slavin, USA
TODAY
[6] Sultan and Shaitan, www.israelshamir.net/english/sultan.htm
[7] Kainuka, Kuraiza and Haibar tribes of Arabia in AD 627
Israel Shamir is an Israeli journalist based in Jaffa. His essays can be
found on the site www.israelshamir.net. In order to subscribe to this list or
to be removed from it, please write to israelshamir.net You may freely
display this essay on the Web or forward it, but ask for permission in order
to publish as hard copy.
Want to help spread quality independent journalism? Donate to NileMedia and watch us grow.
Details...
|