The Palestinians' great crime: A brief summary for the uninitiated
By Ali Abunimah
www.abunimah.org
Originally published in The Jordan Times
August 22, 2001
WHAT IS the great, unforgivable crime of the Palestinian people?
Simply put, it is to ask for their rights. It is to ask the
international community to implement and guarantee their right to
live a free and dignified life on their own land as other people do
in the world.
What are their references? The Palestinians are not asking for
something they cooked up from thin air, but for rights enshrined in
the United Nations Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and the League of Nations mandate before them. In their
specific case these rights have been applied to them by numerous UN
General Assembly and Security Council Resolutions.
Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 provide for full Israeli
withdrawal from the occupied territories in exchange for peace with
Israel. UN Resolution 194 guarantees the right of Palestinian
refugees, so cruelly deprived of their country and homes for
fifty-three years, to return to them and live in peace with their
neighbours. While they are waiting for this, under the brutal heel
of Israeli military occupation, the Fourth Geneva Convention is
supposed to protect Palestinians from the abuses of the occupation
army.
What is a people to do when they find their rights denied and almost
every one of the protections rendered worthless by the tanks, troops
and bulldozers of Israel? For almost a full decade, the Palestinians
negotiated in good faith with Israeli governments of the "left" and
"right." They went to the Madrid conference in October 1991, where
Dr Haider Abdul Shafi, their eloquent spokesman, declared before the
entire world that "we are willing to live side-by-side on the land."
Then prime minister of Israel, Yitzhak Shamir, responded that Israel
would never give up an inch of the occupied territories and later
confessed in his memoirs that had he remained in office he would
have allowed the negotiations to drag on for ten years while Israel
completed its colonisation of occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank
and Gaza.
Shamir fell from office, and Yitzhak Rabin, the bone-breaker, took
his place, and the Palestinians pressed on. In 1993, the PLO signed
the Oslo accords and explicitly recognised the State of Israel.
Despite much criticism from Palestinians and others who felt the
Oslo accords were fatally flawed, the PLO embarked on negotiations
for an interim self-rule period to last five years. Agreeing to put
off the toughest issues until last -- borders, settlements, refugees
and Jerusalem -- the Palestinians relied on the good faith of the
United States, if not the Israelis, to ensure that the negotiations
would have a chance to succeed. For years the Palestinian National
Authority (PNA) did the bidding of Israel and the United States,
arresting dissidents without charge or trial, and altering documents
and even history books in order to suit Israel.
But what did Israel do? While saying that it wanted to solve all
outstanding issues by negotiations, it continued to predetermine
them by bulldozers. Shimon Peres followed Rabin, and Benyamin
Netanyahu followed Peres. Each outdid his predecessor in settlement
building.
Since 1993, according to the Israeli group "Peace Now" the number of
housing units in Israeli colonies in the occupied territories
increased by 53 per cent. Palestinians watched as their land
continued to disappear, and settlements and settler-only roads
spread across it. If they resisted they were called "terrorists," if
they did nothing, all hope was lost.
Sometimes Palestinian resistance took unacceptable forms, targeting
Israeli civilians, but this was always taken as an excuse by Israel
to punish the entire Palestinian population and to declare that all
Palestinians are driven by hatred and zealotry.
When a Jewish settler, Baruch Goldstein, massacred dozens of
Palestinians in Hebron, it was the entire Palestinian population of
Hebron that was punished, and is still being punished, not the
settlers who continue to terrorise the inhabitants of the land.
Palestinians watched the promise of economic improvement rot like so
many truck loads of Gazan oranges and tomatoes held up at Israeli
checkpoints. They watched their dreams of democracy and self-rule
evaporate in a fog of mismanagement and greed. Agreement after
agreement was ignored as Israel simply declined to withdraw from
occupied territory as it had promised to do.
But they pressed on. At Camp David last summer, the Palestinian
leadership went and found themselves confronted by a US-Israeli axis
that offered them autonomy or eternal damnation. Accused of spurning
a "generous" offer from then prime minister Ehud Barak, the PNA did
a poor job of explaining to the world that autonomy is not
independence, and that a statelet in part of the West Bank is an
unacceptable compromise on the already enormous compromise contained
in Resolution 242, of allowing Israel to keep the 78 per cent of
Palestine it conquered in 1948 in exchange for allowing the
Palestinians to have a future on just a fifth of the country they
overwhelmingly dominated just two generations ago.
Exasperated, frustrated, angry at the continued denial of their
freedom, the Palestinian people in the occupied territories
rebelled. For this they have paid an enormous and growing price:
More than five hundred dead, most of them unarmed civilians.
Twenty-thousand injured, and millions confined and deprived of work,
medical care and even food and water by blockades and sieges.
The Palestinians turned to the Arab world, and found that its
officials are experts at holding summits and crafting declarations
but incapable of any sustained and coordinated action that would
exact a political or economic price either on Israel or its
supporters for the hell they are imposing on the Palestinians. Now
the PNA has taken the ultimate step that a people must take when it
has had its freedom taken away for so long. It went back to the
international community, as embodied by the United Nations Security
Council, to ask for international action -- at least monitors. The
Palestinians went back to the same international community that
throughout history meticulously applied international law, when for
example it concerned the League of Nations mandate that gave the
Great Powers colonial mastery of the Middle East, or the UN
resolution that created Israel. The Palestinians went back to the
same international community that allowed a million Iraqis to die in
the name of enforcing Security Council resolutions.
But the same Security Council took no action because, as the acting
US Ambassador James Cunningham said, Washington "question[s] the
appropriateness and effectiveness of any action here in New York."
This then, is the end of the road. After 34 years, three million
Palestinians are still under a relentless and inhuman occupation,
and five million are in exile. Negotiations with an Israel that
simply will not stop devouring the little of Palestine that is left
to be negotiated over have proved useless. There is virtually no
element of the international community that is either willing or
able to provide material support for the Palestinians' struggle for
freedom. The Europeans talk about Palestinian rights, but continue
to buy produce from Israel's illegal colonies. The world's sole
superpower, the United States, stands solidly behind Israel and thus
international law is rendered meaningless. The Apache helicopters
that murder and maim, the bullets that kill and the tear gas that
chokes, are all made in the United States, an unconditional gift
from the American taxpayer.
So the message is clear to the Palestinians: You are on your own.
You alone among people do not have human rights by virtue of your
membership in the human family. The world will do nothing for you.
You must either come to terms with the dictates of an enemy that is
a thousand times stronger than you, or you must fight your way to
freedom. For if negotiations, the United Nations, the European
Union, the Arab world are all closed to the Palestinians, where is
there left for them to turn?.
The first eleven months of the Intifada were just the warm up. Now
begins the long war for Palestinian freedom, which will be costly
and bloody for both sides, but which, like the Indians, Algerians,
South Africans and many other colonised nations before them, the
Palestinians will undoubtedly win.
Ali Abunimah
www.abunimah.org
The author is an analyst based in the United States.
|